Briefing · RISE Scenario Development Competition 2026

Design a scenario that builds resilience and integrity

A student competition run by the Centre for Holistic Teaching and Learning (CHTL), HKBU, under the TDLEG-IICA project Resilience and Integrity through Scenario-based Engagement (RISE). You author a two-level branching scenario grounded in the RISE framework — and your scenario becomes a learning resource for other students.

30 Oct 202612:00nn HKT deadline
Englishall submissions
≤ 4students per team
HK$6,000champion prize
6 competences · 5 domains Two-level branching 3–4 options per decision Video + written rationale AI use allowed — must declare
Time left to submit
days
hours
mins
secs
01 · Overview

What the competition is

You design an interactive, two-level branching scenario set in real student life. Each scenario must be built on the RISE framework — 6 core competences and 5 domains of life — and should develop the audience's knowledge of resilience and integrity. Winning and shortlisted scenarios are showcased as reusable learning resources for peers.

🎯

Aim

Raise your own knowledge of resilience & integrity by designing a scenario, and build a resource bank for other students.

🧩

Format

Two-level branching, 3–4 options every time a player makes a decision, with outcomes & debriefs.

📦

Submit

Qualtrics form + a login-free folder with MP4 video(s) and the completed “Scenario Design Description & Rationale”.

Eligibility & teams

Who can enter

  • Current students at higher-education institutions in Hong Kong, China
  • Their affiliated institutions in the Chinese Mainland: BNBU, CityUHK (Dongguan), CUHK-Shenzhen, HKUST (Guangzhou)
  • For HKBU, the eligible list includes School of Continuing Education (SCE) — not the main campus only
  • Staff of higher-education institutions are not eligible

The full official list is in the Terms & Conditions, Section (3).

Teams & entries

  • Individual or team of no more than 4 students
  • Only the team leader submits
  • One person may be in 1 individual + 1 team submission
  • One entry per person / per team — only the last submission counts
  • Teams may mix students from different eligible institutions
  • Entry must be original and never published before

Prizes & key facts

AwardPrize
ChampionHK$6,000
First Runner-upHK$4,000
Second Runner-upHK$3,000
Merit (×10)HK$1,000 each

Cash + award certificate. For a team, the prize is shared by the whole team. Winners may be invited to an award ceremony and the project-end symposium.

🗓️

Submission window

01 Sep 2026 (Tue) 12:00nn → 30 Oct 2026 (Fri) 12:00nn (GMT+8). Late entries are not accepted.

🌐

Language

All submissions must be in English.

⚖️

Rights & consent

The Organiser holds the intellectual property rights of submitted entries, may showcase them, and has the right to publish participants' full name and facial appearance. Data may be anonymised for teaching/learning research (destroyed within 5 years).

Read before designing: by entering you agree to the Terms & Conditions; the organiser’s decision is final; plagiarism or infringing content = disqualification at any time. Because entries are showcased publicly, avoid sensitive or identifying content.
02 · The RISE framework

What is RISE?

RISE = Resilience and Integrity through Scenario-based Engagement. It is the reference framework for the whole competition: 6 core competences applied across 5 interconnected domains of life. Your scenario should cover most of the competences and at least two domains.

Official framework video (123 s) — the source of every definition on this page.

Full framework reference

Verbatim definitions of all 6 competences and 5 domains, the dynamic / contextual / multidirectional model, selection rules, script conventions, the worked mapping, and the cited references.

Open the deep-dive →

🧠 6 competences

The skills you practise: Ethical Judgement, Interpersonal Skills, Self-Awareness, Self-Care, Self-Determination, Self-Regulation.

🌍 5 domains

Where life happens: Academic/Professional, Civic/Political, Environmental, Personal, Relational/Social.

🔄 How they combine

Dynamic model — a non-linear system. Contextual alignment — any competence can apply in any domain depending on the scenario. Multidirectional — the competence “plane” can be turned; there is no fixed mapping.

Explore the competences and domains

Click any item to read its official definition. Use the picker to choose your ≤ 4 competences and ≤ 2 domains and get the code string to paste into your script.

6 Competences C1–C6

5 Domains of life D1–D5

Pick an item →

Its official definition from the RISE framework video appears here.

Your framework codes
Competences: —
Domains: —
Tip: example scripts write codes in brackets right after the evidence, e.g. (C1, C2). Use a minus for a missing/misused competence, e.g. (-C1, C2).

The matrix is fully filled on purpose: per the framework, any competence can be deployed in any domain — the mapping is contextual, not fixed.

03 · How it works

From idea to submission

Timeline

WhenWhat
01 Sep 2026Submission opens, 12:00nn
10 Sep 2026Online briefing session for students (this session) · register via the site
30 Oct 2026Deadline 12:00nn (GMT+8) — form + folder link. No late entries.
AfterJudging by RISE Project Members → winners showcased; award ceremony; possible interview/symposium sharing

The scenario format

Two-level branching

  • Intro scene sets up the situation and characters.
  • Branching point (Level 1) — the player makes a decision: 3–4 options.
  • Each Level 1 choice leads to its own follow-up scene and a Level 2 decision: again 3–4 options.
  • Every path ends in an outcome + debrief.
  • Options should be ambiguous (no black-and-white villain), with one more optimal choice per branch.

Media & rationale

  • Video visualises the scenario — one MP4 clip per branching point, each under one minute.
  • Label clips in the script by exact filename: [Play: Video_Filename.mp4]
  • PowerPoint/Keynote animations exported to MP4 are acceptable.
  • Written rationale on the official template: chosen competences/domains, answers to Q5–Q8 (approx. 100 words each), plus the GenAI declaration.

Submission package

1 · The Qualtrics form

Answer the questions in the official submission page (linked from the site). You select your competences and domains, and paste your scenario script.

2 · The folder link

One link (Google Drive / cloud) that opens without requiring a login, containing:

  • Video file(s) in MP4
  • Completed “Scenario Design Description and Rationale” in PDF or docx/doc
Test it: open the folder link in a private/incognito window. If it asks for a login, it fails the requirement.
04 · Decisions to make

The design decision map

Everything below is a decision your team must consciously make. Tick items off as you settle them — your progress is saved locally in this browser.

Design readiness0%
05 · How an AI agent can help

Human-led, AI-assisted

GenAI tools are allowed and encouraged by the competition — provided you work responsibly and declare any use or non-use, describing what you used and why. Below is how an AI agent fits into each stage of the workflow, and the guardrails that keep the entry compliant.

StageWhat the AI agent can doHuman stays responsible for
IdeationBrainstorm real student dilemmas; generate variations and “what if” branches; suggest characters and settings.Choosing a dilemma that is authentic and relevant to your peers.
Framework mappingSuggest which competences/domains a scene activates; draft the bracketed codes (C1, C2) and negative codes (-C1).Verifying the mapping is defensible against the RISE definitions.
Branch designDraft 3–4 options per branch, all capturing genuine ambiguity; mark one more-optimal path; write outcome debriefs.Judging which options are truly ambiguous vs. straw men.
ScriptDraft the narrative script, iterate on clarity, check English against the language criterion.Originality and voice; keeping it error-free.
MediaStoryboard and shot list; generate TTS narration, animated HTML scenes, captions; render & assemble MP4 clips under one minute.Not infringing copyright; ensuring visuals serve the narrative.
RationaleDraft Q5–Q8 answers within the word limits; assemble the template docx/PDF.Truthful, specific answers about your own design.
QACheck completeness against the rubric; verify the branch structure (2 levels, 3–4 options, an outcome per path); test the folder link.Final read-through and submission.
DeclarationDraft the GenAI acknowledgement sentence from your usage log.Accurate disclosure of every tool and purpose.
Use AI like this
  • Generate ideas, draft, structure, storyboard, polish language.
  • Use it to stimulate thinking and to produce media assets — then declare it.
  • Keep an AI usage log (tool, what, why) as you go.
Never do this
  • Don't submit AI output as your original work without declaring it.
  • Don't paste the official example, or use copyrighted music/images/characters.
  • Don't fabricate framework claims, sources, or testimonials.
  • Don't expose personal data of real people in the video.
06 · Grading rubric

How you will be scored

The official rubric has three weighted blocks. Pick a level for each criterion to estimate your score out of 100 — useful for spotting weak spots before you submit.

Estimated score
0
out of 100
Pick levels →
Weighted from the official rubric levels (Excellent 4 → Unsatisfactory 1). For self-check only; judges decide.
07 · Worked example

Official example: “Group Assignment Dilemma”

This is the organiser's illustrative scenario (paraphrased). It shows the expected depth: two-level branching, an ideal answer per branch, competence codes on every action, and video cues. Do not copy it — originality is required.

Topic

A group assignment where a teammate drafts the analysis with a GenAI writing assistant — and the deadline is Friday.

Framework

Domains D1 Academic/Professional + D5 Relational/Social; competences C1, C2, C3, C5.

Clips

4 scenes, each referenced in the script by filename, e.g. [Play: Scene2.mp4].

Explore the branching (click a Level 1 option)

Codes in green are ideal paths; a minus (e.g. -C1) marks a competence that is missing or misused.

08 · For our discussion

Simon & Lucia — what we need to decide

This page is a working brief for our conversation. The open questions below are ours (not the organiser's).

Our own entry

  • Theme: academic-integrity-under-pressure, resilience-after-failure, peer disclosure, or wellbeing/persistence?
  • Scope: which 2 domains and 4 competences give the strongest, most defensible mapping?
  • Media route: animated HTML scenes → MP4 (our pipeline), or PowerPoint export?
  • Team: who is the lead, and do we also submit an individual entry in a different category?

The helper platform

  • Which parts do students actually struggle with — framework mapping, branching, or video?
  • Do we generate clips, or just guide the design and package the submission?
  • How do we stay clearly unofficial and not reuse organiser branding?
  • Launch target: first week of October, leaving ~3 weeks before the deadline.

Frequently asked questions

Can we submit as a team?
Yes — individually or as a team of up to four. Only the team leader submits; teammates' details go in the form.
How many entries can one person make?
One individual submission and/or one team submission. If multiple entries are submitted, only the last one counts.
Can a team mix students from different institutions?
Yes, as long as every member is a current student at an eligible institution in Hong Kong or an affiliated institution in the Chinese Mainland.
Must the videos be interactive?
No. The competition expects MP4 video clips plus a written scenario description — the interactivity is described in the script/rationale, not necessarily built as software.
How long can each video be?
Keep each clip at a branching point under one minute.
Can we use GenAI?
Yes, responsibly and ethically. You must explicitly acknowledge any use or non-use, and describe what you used and why.
Who owns our scenario after submission?
The Organiser holds the intellectual property rights of the submitted entries and may showcase, distribute, or publish them; winning and shortlisted entries may be published with your name. Consider this before including anything personal.

Open questions / notes

Scratch space for the meeting — saved in this browser only.